Aust v. Aust’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1998
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consider any special needs of the children (such as private school tuition), which cannot be met by an award five percent above the minimum amount set in the guidelines”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.