644 So. 2d 81 - Roberts v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably 955 So. 2d 517 - Galindez v. State (2007), Trotter v. State (2002)
1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. DiFrancesco · 545 So. 2d 838 - Lambert v. State · 581 So. 2d 1305 - State v. James · Seabrook v. State · 537 So. 2d 982 - Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Neither the rules nor the substantive law justifies a defendant receiving the largesse of a judicial error.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a defendant something to which he is not entitled.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If probation or community control is revoked, the court shall adjudge the probationer or offender guilty of the offense charged and proven or admitted, unless he or she has previously been adjudged guilty, and impose any sentence which it might have originally imposed before placing the probationer on probation or the offender into community control. (emphasis added).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.