Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 644 SW2D 374 - Burrage v. McGee

Burrage v. McGee’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1988
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Zalle v. Underwood · Heberer v. Duncan · Kreutz v. Wolff · Reed Ex Rel. Reed v. Burks · Overbey v. Fodde

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “INSTRUCTION NO. 11 In your verdict you must assess a percentage of fault to plaintiff Brian L. Snelling if you believe: First, plaintiff Brian L. Snelling knew or by the use of the highest degree of care could have known that there was a reasonable likelihood of collision in time thereafter to have slackened his speed but plaintiff Brian L. Snelling failed to do so, or Second, plaintiff Brian L. Snelling failed to keep a careful lookout, and Third, plaintiff Brian L. Snelling in any one or more of the respects submitted in Paragraphs First or Second was thereby negligent, and Fourth, as a direct result of such negligence plaintiff Brian L. Snelling sustained damage. ****** INSTRUCTION NO. 16 If you find in favor of plaintiff Jerome J. Lempe your verdict must be for defendant on his claim against Brian L. Snelling and you must assess a percentage of fault to Brian L. Snelling if you believe: First, plaintiff Brian L. Snelling knew or by the use of the highest degree of care could have known that there was a reasonable likelihood of collision in time thereafter to have slackened his speed but plaintiff Brian L. Snelling failed to do so, or Second, plaintiff Brian L. Snelling failed to keep a careful lookout, and Third, plaintiff Brian L. Snelling in any one or more of the respects submitted in Paragraphs First or Second was thereby negligent, and Fourth, as a direct result of such negligence plaintiff Jerry Lempe sustained damage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.