Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 644 S.W.2d 843 - Ates v. State

Ates v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2010

3 state decisions

101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Clark v. State · 164 Tex. Crim. 78 - Phillips v. State · 35 Tex. Crim. 231 - Tate v. State · McWherter v. State · 135 Tex. Crim. 327 - Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a well recognized principle of law in this State that, to sustain a conviction, it should appear not only that an offense as charged has been committed but there should also be proof to a degree of certainty greater than a mere probability of strong suspicion tending to establish that the party charged was the person who committed or was a participant in its commission. There must be legal and competent evidence pertinently identifying the defendant with the transaction constituting the offense charged against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.