Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 645 A2D 574 - Lyons v. United States

Lyons v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 1996
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Olano · Barker v. Wingo · Burks v. United States · Arizona v. Fulminante

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “From the pattern of peremptory challenges exercised, it appears certain that the defense would have stricken [the juror] had they known she was acquainted with a potential government witness. On the [first day of voir dire ], three jurors said they recognized police officers from the group of potential government witnesses; all three were stricken — one for cause and two through peremptory challenges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.