State v. Kennedy’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Horton v. California · United States v. Rutkowski · State v. Harriman · State v. Snow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the officers] must not have violated the Fourth Amendment in arriving at the place in which the evidence is in plain view. Second, the incriminating character of the items to be seized must be immediately apparent. Third, the officer[s] must have a lawful right of access to the items.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dignoti
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.