United States v. Wolf’s Empirical Analysis
645 F.2d 23 · 1981
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2024
20 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pereira v. United States · United States v. Stanford · United States v. Tarnopol · Gonzales v. United States · United States v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the statement had a natural tendency to influence, or was capable of influencing, the decision of a government agency in making a determination required to be made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[The falsified certificate] was required by the agency and was a basic part of the regulatory structure which depended on the accuracy and truth of such certificates.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[s]ection 1001 is basically a provision directed to statements to obtain federal funds or direct governmental benefits [but] is of course not so expressly limited....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.