Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 645 F.2d 660 - Richardson v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund

Richardson v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund’s Empirical Analysis

645 F.2d 660 · 1981

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
January 2016
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably Halpin v. Ww Grainger Incorporated (1992), Wolfe v. Jc Penney Company Inc (1983)

46 federal appellate · 8 district ·

3901981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Wardle v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund · Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United States · Mrs. Geneva B. Phillips v. William J. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'were intended to help claimants process their claims efficiently and fairly,'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “set[ ] forth the specific reasons for such denial, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the participant”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to require the Board of Trustees to issue a written opinion that includes specific reasons for the decision. Baldfaced conclusions do not satisfy this requirement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.