Cruz v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
645 F.2d 812 · 1981
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2003
4 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hall v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Cox v. Califano · Vidal v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“duty 'scrupulously and conscientiously [to] probe into, inquire of, and explore for all the relevant facts' in [a] case involving an unrepresented, poorly-educated pro se claimant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“must be 'especially diligent in ensuring that favorable as well as unfavorable facts and circumstances are elicited.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the type of showing which the applicant had to make in order to prove his case successfully.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.