Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 645 F.2d 880 - Key v. Rutherford

Key v. Rutherford’s Empirical Analysis

645 F.2d 880 · 1981

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
October 2008
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently October 2008 · most notably Conaway v. Smith (1988), Egger v. Phillips (1983)

56 federal appellate · 2 district ·

590198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · Wood v. Strickland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the Board's decision not to rehire him. Respondent having carried that burden, however, the District Court should have gone on to determine whether the Board had shown by a preponderance of the evidence that it would have reached the same decision as to respondent's reemployment even in the absence of the protected conduct. 28 We hold that the court's instruction on Ewers' First Amendment claim was overly broad. It allowed the jury to improperly specualte on the”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The trial court here did not have the benefit of the Owen decision when he formulated his instructions. On this record, the jury could have found in favor of the City of Stroud solely because of the good faith instruction. We believe the interests of justice are best served by remanding the case for a new trial as to the City of Stroud and the individual defendants in their official capacities in light of the holding in Owen.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"A city may prevent union membership of managers and supervisory personnel if it can show there is a substantial state interest in the limitation on associational rights and that the limits employed are narrowly drawn to avoid unnecessary abridgement of such rights.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.