Cooke v. Solis

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2011.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2011-05-31

2 counsel of record

Relies on Swarthout v. Cooke · Swarthout v. Cooke

Decided 2011-05-31

¶1Amy F. Morton, Esquire, Morton & Russo, Vallejo, CA, Michael Satris, Esquire, Law Office of Michael Satris, Bolinas, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

¶2Jessica Nicole Blonien, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Elizabeth S. Kim, Esquire, Office of the California Attorney General, Oakland, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

¶3 *1097Before: STEPHEN REINHARDT, KIM McLANE WARDLAW, and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5Appellant’s motion to file the supplemental brief lodged with the Clerk’s office is GRANTED. In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Swarthout v. Cooke, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 859, 178 L.Ed.2d 732, dated January 24, 2011, the district court’s order denying the writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED.