Kuperman v. Wrenn’s Empirical Analysis
645 F.3d 69 · 2011
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 26 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Turner v. Safley · Powell v. McCormack · Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Craft · O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“compared with others similarly situated, the plaintiff was treated differently because of an improper consideration, such as his religion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“1) whether there is a valid, rational eon- . nection between the regulation and the legitimate government interest put forward to justify it; 2) whether alternative means to exercise the right exist; 3) the impact that accommodating the right will have on prison resources; and 4) the absence of alternatives to the prison regulation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.