Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 645 P2D 50 - State v. Theobald

State v. Theobald’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 2004
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2004

10 state decisions

50198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bradshaw · State v. Pilcher · State v. Munger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a 'statute is not unconstitutionally vague if it is sufficiently explicit to inform the ordinary reader what conduct is prohibited”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.