Frazier v. Otis Elevator Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2010
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 436 So. 2d 236 - Lasar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Bachanov · Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Fulmer · 458 So. 2d 335 - Ashby Division of Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Dobkin · Otis Elevator Co. v. Gerstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence of the occurrence or non-occurrence of prior accidents is admissible only if it pertains to the use of the same type of appliance or equipment under substantially similar conditions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Frazier was remanded for a new trial because the trial court admitted evidence of other pallet jack accidents where it was not shown that the accidents involved the use of an Otis pallet jack under substantially similar conditions. Contrary to what DuPont argues here, this case does not require”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.