Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

645 So. 2d 1058

Cratsley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 16, 1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-11-16

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2002

1 state decisions

Relies on 442 So. 2d 296 - Thomas v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-11-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Barry Cratsley challenges the revocation of his probation in case nos. 89-5191, 89-6111, and 90-6037. He contends that his guilty plea was not freely and voluntarily entered.

¶2In order for the issue of the voluntariness of a plea to be considered on direct appeal, a defendant must have filed a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court. Thomas v. State, 442 So.2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Cratsley did not do so.

¶3Accordingly, we affirm Cratsley’s judgments and sentences in the aforementioned cases without prejudice to his filing a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court.

RYDER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.
/645/so2d/1058 · .json · Public domain