Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

645 So. 2d 1133

In re Stephens

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 18, 1994

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1994-11-18

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-11-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2013

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

50199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

|1PER CURIAM.1

¶2Respondent, Eddie L. Stephens, was formally charged with failing to keep his client informed and notarizing a forged affidavit before filing it into the court record, in violation of Rules 1.1(a), 1.3, 1.4, 3.3(a), 3.4(b), 4.1(a) and (b), and 8.4(a), (b), (c), and (d).

¶3The facts developed at the hearing indicated that respondent was retained to defend the St. Michael’s Spiritual Temple of Faith of Baton Rouge in connection with a suit for non-payment of a loan. After filing an answer in the suit, respondent had very little contact with his client. Later in the litigation, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. In order to create a material issue of fact, respondent notarized and caused to be filed into the civil litigation an affidavit purporting to be the sworn statement of the Reverend Dorothy Powell. Shortly after formal charges were filed, respondent began serving a one-year suspension for an unrelated disciplinary violation involving the commingling and conversion of client funds.

¶4In light of the above evidence, the hearing committee recommended that respondent be suspended for one year and one day, while the disciplinary board recommended that respondent be suspended for 18 months.

¶5Upon review of the record of the disciplinary board’s findings and recommendations, and the record filed herein, it is the decision of the court that the disciplinary board’s recommendations be adopted.

¶6Accordingly, it is ordered that Eddie L. Stephens be suspended from the practice of law for a period of 18 months to run consecutively from the suspension he began serving on October 1, |21993 in the matter of In Re: Eddie L. Stephens, Supreme Court No. 93-B-0939. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent, and reinstatement is conditioned upon their payment.

¶7SUSPENSION ORDERED.

¶8. Marcus, J., not on the panel. Rule IV, Part 2, § 3.

/645/so2d/1133 · .json · Public domain