Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 645 SO2D 1309 - State v. Parker

State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Having legitimately stopped the defendant whom they were just told moments before was selling drugs they saw that his fist is clenched. Common sense dictated that he was holding the merchandise he was selling in the clenched fist. Defendant had no expectation of privacy in his clenched fist under these circumstances. In addition since the clenched fist in all probability held drugs the situation was analogous to the drugs being in the plain view of the officers.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To hold otherwise would seriously discourage a citizen from reporting an ongoing crime to a policeman.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.