Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 645 So. 2d 156 - Howard v. State

645 So. 2d 156 - Howard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on New York v. Belton · Minnesota v. Dickerson · Gibson v. United States · 564 So. 2d 480 - Cresswell v. State · Cross v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Perhaps the unspoken reason for limiting searches and seizures to objects thought to be weapons is that any other rule would have the practical effect of allowing law enforcement officers to search for contraband with less than probable cause on the ostensible premise of looking for weapons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “springboard for a search for other items”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.