645 So. 2d 358 - Allison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Arizona v. Hicks · 420 So. 2d 812 - Harris v. State · Drury v. Abdallah · Ballard v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'This court cannot assume error, nor can it presume the existence of facts to which the record is silent. . . . The appellant has the burden of ensuring that the record contains sufficient evidence to warrant reversal. . . .' " '. . . An appellate court "cannot presume the existence of facts as to which the record is silent and make it a ground for reversal”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'. . . " ' ". . . 'Appellant has the burden of showing reversible error, and error must affirmatively appear.' . . . 'Substantial error is not presumed, but the burden is upon the appellant to show error'. . . . 'A reviewing court cannot predicate error on matters not shown by the record. Indeed, a silent record supports a judgment'. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The motion [to dismiss] itself was unverified and was not accompanied by any supporting affidavits. Consequently, the assertions of counsel contained therein `are bare allegations and cannot be considered as evidence or proof of the facts alleged.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Walker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.