Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

645 So. 2d 370

Grimsley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · decided 1994-07-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1998

2 state decisions

Relies on 622 So. 2d 447 - Brooks v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-07-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BOWEN, Presiding Judge.

¶1This is an appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant, Thomas Grimsley, an inmate of the Alabama prison system, challenges the denial of “retroactive good time.”

¶2The appellant was convicted of rape in the second degree on August 10, 1990, and was sentenced to 10 year's’ imprisonment. He contends that his denial of good time is based on Ala.Code 1975, § 14 — 9—41(h), which denies good time to sex offenders.

¶3In Brooks v. State, 622 So.2d 447, 451 (Ala.Cr.App.1993), this Court held that “the sex offender exception to § 14-9-41(h) (Supp.1992) is without rational basis and therefore a violation of equal protection principles.”

¶4The judgment of the circuit court dismissing the appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is reversed and this cause is remanded with directions that the circuit court reconsider the petition in light of the principles announced in Brooks.

¶5REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.
/645/so2d/370 · .json · Public domain