Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 645 SO2D 389 - Caruso v. State

Caruso v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Keen v. State (2000), 889 So. 2d 743 - Huggins v. State (2004)

33 state decisions

190199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · Thompson v. Louisiana · Spiegel's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if a witness is cross-examined concerning a collateral or irrelevant matter, the cross-examiner must `take' the answer, is bound by it, and may not subsequently impeach the witness by introducing extrinsic evidence to contradict the witness on that point”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that the prejudice of out-of-court statements used to relate accusatory information but offered simply to establish the logical sequence [of the police investigation] outweighs the probative value of such evidence, rendering it inadmissible.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Officer Raimondi said they went to [the witness] to ask her about a white male she reported having seen at midnight December 5. Officer Faby said Walker gave him a description of the man she saw, and the description matched Caruso.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.