Cook v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably 882 So. 2d 977 - Moore v. State (2004), State v. Matthews (2004)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 396 So. 2d 1107 - Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'n · 622 So. 2d 941 - Tripp v. State · 594 So. 2d 273 - Williams v. State · 591 So. 2d 1055 - State v. Tripp · Cook v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“be treated in relation to each other, even after a portion of the sentence has been violated.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“must continue to "be treated in relation to each other, even after a portion of the sentence has been violated." ... Accordingly, where a defendant is sentenced to prison to be followed by probation for multiple offenses, and ultimately violates that probation, that defendant's cumulative sentence may not exceed the guidelines range of the original scoresheet.... Otherwise, trial judges could structure sentences in such a manner as to circumvent the guidelines.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“if a trial court imposes a term of probation on one offense consecutive to a sentence of incarceration on another offense, credit for time served on the first offense must be awarded on the sentence imposed after revocation of probation on the second offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.