Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

645 So. 2d 572

Frazier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 18, 1994

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1994-11-18

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1995

2 state decisions

Relies on Thompson v. State · 644 So. 2d 585 - Santoro v. State · 643 So. 2d 50 - Craig v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-11-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We vacate the habitual offender sentence imposed in this case and remand this cause for resentencing. See Santoro v. State, 644 So.2d 585 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Thompson v. State, 638 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). See also Cole v. State, 640 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). We also vacate the Public Defender’s lien imposed in this case because the trial court failed to comply with rule 3.720(d)(1) of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. See Craig v. State, 643 So.2d 50 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). In resentencing on remand, the trial court shall comply with rule 3.720(d)(1) before assessing a Public Defender’s lien.

¶2Sentence VACATED; cause REMANDED.

HARRIS, C.J., and PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.
/645/so2d/572 · .json · Public domain