Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 645 So. 2d 91 - State v. Will

645 So. 2d 91 - State v. Will’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stovall v. Denno · Linkletter v. Walker · Witt v. State · Hance v. Georgia · Olinde v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defendant should be told of his or her eligibility for habitualization, the maximum habitual offender term for the charged offense, the fact that habitualization may affect the possibility of early release through certain programs, and, where habitual violent felony offender provisions are implicated, the mandatory minimum term.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the court must confirm that the defendant is personally aware of the possibility and reasonable consequences of habitualization.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[f]ailure to follow any of the procedures in this rule shall not render a plea void absent a showing of prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.