Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 645 S.W.2d 303 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently January 2007 · most notably Denton v. State (1995), Joseph v. State (1999)

56 state decisions

210198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rice v. State · Rodriguez v. State · Lloyd v. State · Ward v. State · Shaw v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence, by act or intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly by omission, causes to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual: [[Image here]] (3) bodily injury. [[Image here]] [ (c) ](2) “Elderly individual” means a person 65 years of age or older. (3) “Disabled individual” means a person older than 14 years of age who by reason of age or physical or mental disease, defect, or injury is substantially unable to protect himself from harm or to provide food, shelter, or medical care for himself. [[Image here]] (f) An offense under Subsection (a)(3) is a felony of the third degree when the conduct is committed intentionally or knowingly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An inference or a presumption of a defendant’s guilt of a burglary or theft sufficient to sustain a conviction may arise from possession by a defendant of property stolen or taken in a recent burglary. However, in the prosecution for either a theft or a burglary, to warrant such an inference or presumption of guilt from the circumstances of possession alone, such possession must be personal, must be recent, must be unexplained, and must involve a distinct and conscious assertion or right to the property by the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"(a) A person commits an offense if, without the effective consent of the owner, he breaks into or enters a vehicle or any part of a vehicle with intent to commit any felony or theft.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.