Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 645 SW2D 57 - State v. Hills

State v. Hills’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2016

10 state decisions

701982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Washington Post Co. v. Rebozo · State v. Black · State v. Harris · State v. Weekley · State v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendant next contends that once the trial court found the state’s evidence insufficient to submit the case to the jury on capital murder, the court could not properly submit the case on second degree murder and manslaughter.. We disagree. Second degree murder is a lesser included offense of capital murder. The trial court was, obligated to submit to the jury the highest degree of the charge justified by the evidence. The point is without merit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “1. A person is criminally responsible for the conduct of another when [[Image here]] (2) Either before or during the commission of an offense with the purpose of promoting the commission of an offense, he aids or agrees to aid or attempts to aid such other person in planning, committing or attempting to commit the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.