Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 646 F.2d 1158 - Calhoun v. Baylor

Calhoun v. Baylor’s Empirical Analysis

646 F.2d 1158 · 1981

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2016 · most notably Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co. (1989), United States v. Hathaway (1986)

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

2501981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 544

Relies on 3 Smith & H. 417 - James v. Joseph · Walter C. Thompson, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Janie Underdown Thompson, Deceased v. Illinois Central Railroad Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing civil jury verdicts to determine whether the evidence is sufficient to support the judgment, we follow the traditional rule of viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Rule 803(6) is inapplicable because the witness, Hockhauser, played no role in the creation or compilation of the records and was therefore in no position to attest to their reliability”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.