United States v. Mayo’s Empirical Analysis
646 F.2d 369 · 1981
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably United States v. Kessi (1989), United States v. Lord (1983)
38 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · Meachum v. Fano · Texas v. Louisiana · County of Los Angeles v. Chavez-Salido · United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the differences in the periods of time covered by the alleged conspiracies, the places where the conspiracies were alleged to occur, the persons charged as co-conspirators, the overt acts alleged to have been committed, and the statutes alleged to have been violated.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is ordinarily reasonable to assume that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of acts knowingly done or knowingly omitted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.