United States v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis
646 F.2d 962 · 1981
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2004
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hall v. Cole · United States v. Sutherland · United States v. Richards · Moore v. United States · United States v. Sutherland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Having tried and appealed its case on one theory, an unsuccessful party may not then use a petition for rehearing as a device to test a new theory.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]bsent exceptional circumstances we do not consider issues that are first presented in an application for rehearing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.