Conservation Force v. Salazar’s Empirical Analysis
646 F.3d 1240 · 2011
Citation profile
14 district ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1538 (§ 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 18 U.S.C. § 983
Relies on Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department · Rafael Navarro v. Sherman Block · Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. · Serra v. Lappin · Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. v. Tandy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted 'tests the legal sufficiency of a claim.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“A district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is proper if there is a 'lack of a cognizable legal theory or the absence of sufficient facts alleged under a cognizable legal theory.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“to survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter to state a facially plausible claim to relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.