Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 646 FSUPP 953 - Korwek v. Hunt

Korwek v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
December 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably Korwek v. Hunt (1987), 815 F. Supp. 620 - In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities Litigation (1993)

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 12 (§ 1 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 15B (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 80A · 7 U.S.C. § 13 · 7 U.S.C. § 6B

Relies on Wilson v. Garcia · American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah · Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. General Electric Company · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKey · Sloan v. Hicks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he guiding principle is that in the absence of case law directly on point or a state commodity fraud statute and an accompanying rule of limitation, the most appropriate state limitations period is that which federal courts sitting in that state apply to federal securities fraud causes of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “regular newspaper readers knew what this case was about”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “), the Board of Trade for the City of Chicago (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.