646 F. Supp. 2d 1041 - Anderson v. Hackett’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2617 (§ 18 of the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 133 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 1453 (§ 5 of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 42 U.S.C. § 7401 (Air Quality Act of 1967) · 50 U.S.C. § 4557
Relies on Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. · Boyle v. United Technologies Corp. · Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc. · Mesa v. California · Dolan v. United States Postal Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] removing defendant must show that at all times it was acting under express orders, control and directions of federal officers, and that its involvement in conduct giving rise to state-court liability was strictly and solely at federal behest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.