Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 646 P2D 1288 - Isom v. State

Isom v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2001

17 state decisions

90198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Renfro v. State · Harris v. State · Lovell v. State · Williams v. State · Marr v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Both of the arresting officers and the attending nurse testified that the appellant though intoxicated, was alert and understood what was happening around him when he consented to the test. Thus, the trial court was presented with sufficient conflicting evidence to dismiss the appellant’s motion to suppress the results of the blood test. The question of suppressing evidence is a judicial question and this Court will not reverse the trial court upon a question of fact where there is a conflict of evidence, and there is competent evidence reasonably tending to support the judge’s findings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. McLeod v. State
  2. “In all cases in which the defendant is prosecuted for a second or subsequent offense, except in those cases in which former conviction is an element of the offense, the procedure shall be as follows: [provisions for bifurcated trials] (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Hoover v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.