Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 646 P2D 337 - People v. Kendrick

People v. Kendrick’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 1989
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on People v. Radinsky · People v. Radinsky · People v. Harfmann · People v. Kluver · People v. Bugg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) A lawyer shall not: [[Image here]] (5) Engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(A) A lawyer shall not: [[Image here]] (3) Neglect a legal matter entrusted to him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.