In Re ARG’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Viar v. North Carolina Department of Transportation · Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc. · North Carolina Consumers Power, Inc. v. Duke Power Co. · Diaz v. Division of Social Services · In re T.R.P.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“could have prevented the trial court from acquiring subject matter jurisdiction over the juvenile action would be to elevate form over substance. Such a holding would additionally impose jurisdictional limitations which the General Assembly clearly never intended when it sought to balance the interests of children with the rights of parents in juvenile actions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the child's present address or whereabouts, the places where the child has lived during the last five years, and the names and present addresses of the persons with whom the child has lived during that period.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“absence of the juvenile's address on the petition did not prevent the trial court from exercising subject matter jurisdiction over this juvenile action”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.