Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 646 SE2D 617 - In Re SEP

In Re SEP’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. Gibbs · In re T.R.P. · In Re TRP · 162 N.C. App. 355 - In Re Miller · In re N.R.M.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “), a Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]f Pam Frazier was an authorized representative of the DSS director, she should have signed her own name and checked the `Authorized Representative' box. In that circumstance, we likely would reach a different result[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We take this opportunity to suggest that properly [signing and] verifying a petition is likely to be the easiest part of DSS's job.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.