Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 646 So. 2d 1005 - State v. Gordon

646 So. 2d 1005 - State v. Gordon’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 2015

7 state decisions

40199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Ross · Texas v. Brown · Horton v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The jury's verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence introduced at the trial of this case. 2. The trial court erroneously refused to suppress for use as evidence at the trial items seized during warrantless searches by the police on or about January 8, 1993, of the persons of "defendants" and of the automobile in which they were riding. [3]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Johnson testified that narcotics are commonly weighed and sold in gram amounts. State Exhibit S-4 contained the blue bag and its contents. There was a little red notebook inside the blue bag. In the back of this notebook there is a list of numbers with a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`there is no reasonable expectation of privacy from lawfully positioned officers with inquisitive nostrils.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.