State v. Sheppard’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2005
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · Hill v. Lockhart · McMann v. Richardson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687 , 104 S.Ct. at 2064 . The key question is whether counsel's performance was reasonable considering all the circumstances. State v. Sheppard, 94-694 (La.App. 5th Cir. 11/16/94), 646 So.2d 1130 . Second, defendant must show that the deficiency was so great as to prejudice the defense. This requires a showing that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, or”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.