Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 646 So. 2d 1200 - Mancuso v. Siegel

646 So. 2d 1200 - Mancuso v. Siegel’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 630 So. 2d 714 - Segura v. Frank · 486 So. 2d 717 - Hebert v. Doctors Memorial Hosp. · 418 So. 2d 543 - Senac v. Sandefer · 611 So. 2d 721 - Lastie v. Warden · 529 So. 2d 877 - Adams v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Any person having a claim against an insurer under any provision in an insurance policy, other than a policy of an insolvent insurer which is also a covered claim, shall be required first to exhaust his rights under such policy. Such other policies of insurance shall include but shall not be limited to liability coverage, uninsured or underinsured motorist liability coverage, or both, hospitalization, and other medical expense coverage. As to the association, any amount payable by such other insurance shall act as a credit against the damages of the claimant, and the association shall not be liable for such portion of the damages of the claimant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.