Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 646 SO2D 585 - Perley v. Tapscan, Inc.

Perley v. Tapscan, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Holiday Isle, LLC v. Adkins (2008), 830 So. 2d 720 - State v. Lawhorn (2002)

33 state decisions

160199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 559 So. 2d 1075 - Martin v. FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN · 551 So. 2d 280 - Triple J Cattle, Inc. v. Chambers · 559 So. 2d 158 - Alabama Power Co. v. Drummond · 621 So. 2d 1235 - Fulton v. Callahan · 582 So. 2d 538 - Davis v. Hester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A preliminary injunction should be issued only when the party seeking an injunction demonstrates: “ ‘ “(1) that without the injunction the [party] would suffer irreparable injury; (2) that the [party] has no adequate remedy at law; (3) that the [party] has at least a reasonable chance of success on the ultimate merits of his case; and (4) that the hardship imposed on the [party opposing the preliminary injunction] by the injunction would not unreasonably outweigh the benefit accruing to the [party seeking the injunction].” ’ ””
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'Irreparable injury' is an injury that is not redressable in a court of law through an award of money damages.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.