Crenshaw v. Crenshaw’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Clark v. Albertville Nursing Home, Inc. · King v. Travelers Ins. Co. · International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Hatas · 540 So. 2d 736 - McCrary v. Butler · 470 So. 2d 1207 - Jones v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Betty and Fred did not have a sufficient common legal interest in the subject matter discussed in the decedent's hospital room to make the attorney-client privilege applicable. In fact, the interests of Betty and Fred could be considered adverse to each other, or to those of the decedent."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Partin and Miss Kelly were both interested in a legal sense in the subject matter discussed at the conference with Mr. Beddow, Jr.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`the *Page 16 presence of such third party defeats the confidential nature of the conference and thereby the privilege.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.