Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 646 So. 2d 676 - Hatcher v. State

646 So. 2d 676 - Hatcher v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2018

13 state decisions

50199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spicer v. State · 505 So. 2d 1067 - Donahoo v. State · McAdory v. State · Bowden v. State · Ex Parte Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an inducement, or that which leads or tempts the mind to do or commit the crime charged.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the offense(s) charged; (2) the circumstances surrounding the offense(s) charged and the collateral offense(s); (3) the other collateral evidence offered at trial, and (4) the other purpose(s) for which it is offered.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Under the facts of this case, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting evidence of Register’s collateral sexual misconduct committed upon his natural daughter, because that evidence had some tendency to show that Register had a passion or propensity for unusual and abnormal sexual relations. See C. Gamble, Character Evidence, supra, at 45-46.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.