Denmark v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Rodriguez v. New York · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · Hialeah, Inc. v. Bell · 506 So. 2d 1039 - In re Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 6C(1)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence of wrongdoing on the part of a third party is inadmissible as irrelevant to a given case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beckett v. State“effect of this evidence may have caused the jury to infer”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Beckett v. State“evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Beckett v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.