Nank v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
68 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 668 So. 2d 589 - State v. Hart (1996), 674 So. 2d 123 - Justice v. State (1996)
68 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · 503 So. 2d 321 - State v. Causey · 635 So. 2d 1032 - Sutton v. State · 378 So. 2d 7 - Rodriguez v. State · 618 So. 2d 734 - Biller v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so that the defendant has the opportunity to object”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“if it (1) has no relationship to the crime of which the offender was convicted, (2) relates to conduct which is not in itself criminal, and (3) requires or forbids conduct which is not reasonably related to future criminality.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“With regard to a special condition not statutorily authorized, however, the law requires that it be pronounced orally at sentencing before it can be included in the written probation order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.