Mayo v. Simon’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2017
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on St. Landry Oil & Gas Co. v. Neal · Bologna Bros. v. Stephens · 562 So. 2d 1060 - Spencer-Wallington, Inc. v. Service Merchandise · Day v. Day · Canal Marine Supply, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hen a vendor sells property which he does not own and later acquires title, ownership immediately vests in the buyer. This concept is known as the doctrine of after acquired title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the jurisprudence is clear that the one year period in which to bring a claim is peremptive, not prescriptive, and cannot be interrupted by contra non valentem.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Glod v. Baker“shall be prescribed by one year running from the time of the transaction or act which gave rise to this right of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.