Hodges v. Casey’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1984
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stockyards National Bank v. Maples · Richardson v. D. S. Cage Co. · Houseman v. Mahin · Munoz v. Farmland Industries, Inc. · Casey v. Hodges
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Prove that one of the defendants is a resident of the county of suit; (2) Prove a cause of action against the resident defendant; and (3) Allege a joint cause of action against the resident and non-resident defendants or one so intimately connected with the cause of action alleged against the nonresident defendant that the two may be joined to avoid a multiplicity of suits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““If two or more defendants reside in different counties, suit may be brought in any county where one of the defendants resides.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.