Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 646 SW2D 225 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2019

21 state decisions

901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moore v. State · Montgomery v. State · Kirkpatrick v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) It is a defense to prosecution that the actor through mistake formed a reasonable belief about a matter of fact if his mistaken belief negated the kind of culpability required for the commission of the offense.[ 2 ]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This [contention] ignores the rule that a defendant is entitled to submission of every defensive issue raised by the evidence. ... To hold as requested by the State would be to strike [the mistake of fact defense] from the Penal Code.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The check was the instrumentality by which appellant received the cash. The use of a check does not render the evidence insufficient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.