Ozack v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2015
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. United States · Shappley v. State · McCarty v. State · McClendon v. State · Robinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Knowingly offerfed] to engage in sexual conduct, namely: sexual intercourse and deviate sexual intercourse with E.L. Moses, for a fee.” The trial court denied her motion to quash. On appeal, she argued that the allegation of “offer”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moreno“`negotiations,' in which implied offers were made by both appellant and the [officer].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mattias v. State“the reasoning of McCarty, supra, controlling,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mattias v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.