Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 647 F.2d 1020 - Jackson v. Fletcher

Jackson v. Fletcher’s Empirical Analysis

647 F.2d 1020 · 1981

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
6
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Slakan v. Porter (1984), Hinds v. General Motors Corp. (1993)

29 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

1801981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Millers' National Insurance Company, Chicago, Illinois, and Cross-Appellees v. The Wichita Flour Mills Company, and Cross-Appellant. The Wichita Flour Mills Company, and Cross-Appellant v. Millers' National Insurance Company, Chicago, Illinois, and Cross-Appellees · Ramseyer v. General Motors Corp. · Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. Mahaffy · Barnes v. General Motors Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where ... an experiment purports to simulate actual events and to show the jury what presumably occurred at the scene of the accident, the party introducing the evidence has a burden of demonstrating substantial similarity of conditions. They may not be identical but they ought to be sufficiently similar so as to provide a fair comparison.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in many instances, a slight change in the conditions under which the experiment is made will so distort the result as to wholly destroy its value as evidence, and make it harmful, rather than helpful.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'similarity of circumstances and conditions'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.