Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 647 F.2d 701 - Concord Control, Inc. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America

Concord Control, Inc. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America’s Empirical Analysis

647 F.2d 701 · 1981

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
October 1994
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation · Forster v. United States · Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. · A-T-O, Inc. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the determination of the PBGC ... is entitled to great deference in the construction and application of ERISA.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.